|
Politics Forum
|
List All Forums | About |
message board home
Next
11/14/2020 11:24:36 PM
 
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 4: President & Congress Subject: Post-election predictions Msg# 1103984
|
||||||
|
Have you heard about the statistical experts being called upon -- They're applying probability science to those straight Dem's top of ballot only "strings" So many in a row produced incredibly lopsided probability odds. Seems more good thinking.
Hang in there Bob. OK Tom, I'll "Hang in there" (Don't say you didn't ask for it). To explore further your 'statistical experts' and 'probably science' references, what say you about using pattern recognition software to determine if 000's of 'President Only' ballots (no down ballot votes) were marked by the same 15 - 20 back-room thugs? I know its a long shot but its a kick knocking this sort of stuff around.* I still think examining 'President Only' ballots for the presence of hand prints is a worthwhile endeavor, in that seemingly untouched (virgin) ballots would be indicative of felonious behavior; at least one print (the voter's) should be present. * Brainstorming: It was one of those 15-minute corporate 'good ideas' a few decades past-- that, and Casual Fridays (inspiring men to spend a small fortune, retooling their wardrobes, just to dress like Arnold Palmer one day a week). |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Finger-printing seems too time consuming. Also problems of smudging while processed by scanning machinery. But you're doing some good thinking. Have you heard about the statistical experts being called upon -- They're applying probability science to those straight Dem's top of ballot only "strings" So many in a row produced incredibly lopsided probability odds. Seems more good thinking. Hang in there Bob. |
