9/25/2020 1:32:14 AM
Section 4: National
Subject: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Msg# 1098769
Your reply seems obtuse to me. I tried to directly address your post and you seemed to go off on a new tangent without responding to what I said. ????
I prefer to deal with things directly before moving to another topic. What you wrote does not deal directly with I said.
What I wrote has some value. Your response is a distraction.
Answer me directly and I will be happy to do likewise.
Reply | ReplyNewSubject
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where:|
It does'nt advance the arguments here to allege they are either hypocrites, or outright liars, either Repubs or Dems., from who said what. Reports show that Shumer & other Dems have argued out of both sides of their mouths, regarding this 2016 vs 2020 issue. Doesn't persuade either side to post lengthy quotes either side has said. So I've refrained.
And your crystal ball's predictions are loaded with liberals dire scenarios invented to scare voters. Millions of Americans have an opposite view from those boogeymen figments outlined by hardened lib views, including some anarchist ideas.
Catering to the lawless mobs isn't the Repubs idea of proper U.S. governance, Nor mine. And I'd be sorry to say, such catering has been seen by Dem Mayors, like in Portland, Seattle, and NYC. Voters should be horrified by these behaviors. Voters should react against politicians who don't take actions to stop this violence.
I'm not against weeding out efforts to improve the police, with negotiated planning. The road to moving forward in the future requires calm in the streets, and verbal debating. Public safety, respect for "most" police, & calm in the streets are some of the biggest issues in this upcoming election.