|
Politics Forum
|
List All Forums | About |
Reading all
70 messages in thread
message board home
message board home
 
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 4: National Subject: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Msg# 1098823
| ||||||
| the president did not say he needed another justice in case he didn't win. He said we needed nines judges to prevent a possible 4-4 vote, and therefore never get final results. | ||||||
|
Reply
| ReplyNewSubject
| ||||||
|
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Sorry that you missed when I answered your allegations of they are either hypocrites, or outright liars. Maybe you read that message, before I had completed some editing to it. Perhaps, take another look. They did say, unconditionally, in 2016, that they would not put a Supreme Court nominee through in 2020, UNCONDITIONALLY! They did not adhere to that! So how is that not hypocritical or a lie? They have the power now and the want to take advantage of it before they loose it (and the will loose it.) Pack the Supremes. If Trump looses, then he can contest it and his Supremes will rule in his favor. Is that the crystal ball you are talking about? Let me know. It is not a crystal ball. Trump has already stated publicly that he needs another justice on the SCOTUS in case the awful mail-in ballots cause him to lose the election. He thinks the "unfair" election might need to go to the SCOTUS in order to resolve the election fairly, in his favor. |
