Politics Forum
|
List All Forums | About |
![]() ![]() Section 4: President & Congress Subject: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Msg# 1098810
|
||||||
ACA is flawed because...
It mandated that Americans must purchase a product. If they didn't conform, they would be subject to a fine, but that would put Mr. Roberts on the wrong side of history vis a vis Obama's legacy. Not to worry: We'll call it a tax, although, I've heard, 'tax' is nowhere in the language of the legislation. The main problems were high costs of previous medical plans and the high number of uninsured. The uninsured could have been addressed by legislation written just for them. The high costs were not alleviated: Today, a couple, purchasing medical insurance, on their own, is likely to pay $2,700 a month with a $12,000 deductible. (I heard two folks on a radio call-in say this, or claim numbers that come close). Are there 20-million uninsured, still? That wasn't supposed to be the case. It can't be because the fine was eliminated, because the fine was way, way lower than monthly insurance premiums; they eschewed purchasing insurance at the get-go. |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Well, Tom, they said then that it would be relevant in 2020. So they are either hypocrites, or outright liars. They have the power now and the want to take advantage of it before they loose it (and the will loose it.) Pack the Supremes. If Trump looses, then he can contest it and his Supremes will rule in his favor. And they will try to abolish the ACA. McConnell has been trying to do that since it was established. Dozens of lawsuits at the taxpayers expense. ACA is flawed because it was extremely difficult to get ANYTHING passed, but have the GOPs ever introduced anything that is better to replace it? And the list goes on... |