Get over it.  Joe

C'mon fellas, it's fun to be a contrarian; I enjoy the role, too.  But, there's this principle impediment that encumbers all contrarians:  By definition, contrarians are more often wrong than spot on.  

The mounting evidence (from ever mounting sources) should be thoroughly investigated.  There's just too many people, in disparate circumstances, willing to risk jail time by coming out claiming they've witnessed fraudulent behavior.  Behavior that brings into question basics like ballot completion on through to ballot-counting software hacks.  It appears these inequities involve multiple states/jurisdictions and serve to favor ONE PARTY.  I suspect you both think:  After all is said and done, nothing of import will surface to benefit the President.  I agree.

The Dominion thing has been on politician's radar screens for years.  The DOJ was made aware of the possibility that Dominion's software is laced with criminal intent but the DOJ acceded to the wishes of CIA and did nothing; a de facto prohibition against any investigative activity involving Dominion and its subordinates.  

It's a long shot, but some of this might make it to the Supremes.  Ever the optimist,  perhaps the Court will proclaim a series of actions to be undertaken by State Legislatures to ensure fair and equitable elections in the future. 

Alan Simpson kept it simple, to wit;

"If you have integrity, nothing else matters.                                                                         If you don't have integrity, nothing else matters."

Thank you,

Bob