Login or Register                                                                                            

HOME | message board | videos | photos |

9/24/2020 8:22:35 PM Reply      or ReplyNewSubject Section 4: President & Congress Subject: Ruth Bader Ginsburg                          Msg# 1098732 From: Tom Hemmick Forum Leader     Joined 7/21/2005 To: Nate Douty (Read)  Joined 2/18/2014

Welcome aboard Nate.  As you read further into this thread, you'll see why the Garland case and the replacing of Ginsburg example are both consistent with historic precedents.   Tom

For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: So I guess that this poll would support that Merrick Garland should have had a hearing??

message board home

---

---

 
Top of Page  |  Previous   Privacy Policy  |   Email Us | About | Terms of Use




Powered by ForumsAmerica.com Version: 05012012.1
ForumsAmerica.com is a Registered Trademark