|
Politics Forum
|
List All Forums | About |
Reading all
70 messages in thread
message board home
message board home
Next
9/23/2020 11:38:40 AM
 
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 4: President & Congress Subject: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Msg# 1098559
|
||||||
|
Ginsburg was confirmed in less time than you are stating.
So why would they not even give Garland a hearing with 9 month to go until the election and now try to push through a a new justice with 6 weeks to go until the election? Ginsburg was not even confirmed in an election year. (96 to 3, by the way) |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: The Supreme Court should not be political. But it is. And you are talking about two men in the big picture of things. Why should two men set the course of history whatever they said today or years ago? Why should one man be humiliated with such horrendous lies and attacked on national tv just because one Party is mad and vindictive and want to take it out on SOMEONE? As I said before, Ginsburg was confirmed in less time than you are stating. Seems the ‘timetable’ arguement falls flat.It can be done. And has many times as Tom has pointed out in a previous post. |
