Politics Forum
|
List All Forums | About |
![]() ![]() ![]() Section 4: President & Congress Subject: Elec truck & car fire fires Msg# 1192603
|
||||||
I think maybe one thing people miss is that green energy issues of all kinds, whether dealing with personal or mass transportation or power is that the economical factor is NEVER small.
Transportation and energy distribution are at the basic fundamental level of our society and when we fiddle with the rules and insist on this change or that change, then there are massive costs to us all. It can significantly slow down the movement and pace of commerce from city to city, and in so doing lead to significant inflation and hardship for everyone. When government snaps it’s fingers calling for quick changes to energy sources, the damage to everyone can be massive. See the killing of the oil pipeline and the cost of gas rising and the supply chain problem and the inflation rate for example. And so, in a world where such issues are all too often ignored and in which we’ve already seen enormous consequences like worldwide inflation, it is very hard to call you or anyone else “obsessed” when you are expressing concerns with green energy and electric vehicles. |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Mark When Joe & Jim have not answered the specifics your comments, seems they really had no information for any rebuttals. I'd suggest that's why they've resorted to cutsie rhetoric. Thus your specifics stand without challenge. Especially when you noted that the EV's are very much younger than millions of gas powered cars still on our roads. YES Its the math. As they age, more flaws can emerge in any machinery. And you likely recall, I also posted a number of reasons showing how many of the EV's failings were omitted from being mentioned in that govt study which Jim quoted. One reason I mentioned was the young age of the EV's. Age brings additional failures. And the hybrids, which have been around for a while, in fact, had the worst record for fires. Again Jim & Joe have not challenged those specifics -- We both now stand unchallenged. Readers, of course, know that Cutsie remarks lack any real substance.
|