Here's an aspect you should consider.  Its from an earlier message to Dave.  

Main stream media pushes the mistaken belief that "testimony" is not evidence. When looking at court cases, the vast percentage of evidence is indeed testimony. Its not just innuendo as the media would have folks believe. They falsely say -- there's no evidence, knowing there's some sworn testimony before congress or in court proceedings.

And when there's corroborating testimony, from more than one source, it becomes even more credible. Its one way that cases are proven to juries.

Dems need to recognize these factors. And stop saying -- there's no evidence -- a laughably false statement regarding Hunter matters. 

And when there's bank account info corroborating testimony, that's extremely powerful.  MSM are totally lying by ignoring such powerful evidence