|
Politics Forum
|
List All Forums | About |
message board home
Next
12/6/2020 3:11:23 PM
 
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 4: President & Congress Subject: Various election experts Msg# 1105885
|
||||||
|
Two courts prevented Rudy from presenting evidence and did peremptory dismissals, as previously mentioned here. Another court is claiming to overnight read 800 or more affidavits, and then rule.
Also its taken digging out to find much of that info. Much of the media has been reluctant to point out such details Answer then seems there's lots of "chickens" and fear in the judiciary of those jurisdictions, my personal view. Judges not wanting really to delve down into the weeds. Amounts to muzzling. The other missing component seems the lack of examining the commonality of how things occurred, repeating patterns in the various states. In criminal law this is called-- modus operandi, or mode of operations, or a common plan. Its where prosecutors are allowed to show such commonality to strengthen their cases. Seems only the Supreme Court would be taking the wider span of such views, across state lines, rather than a state court. Again my personal view. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: One question, if all this evidence exist then why hasn't the Trump legal team introduced it into evidence in even one court? Several judges have said on the record "bring me evidence of criminal activity and I will ac t on it" They all have said suspicions, feelings and undocumented "reports" are not going to get it done, only evidence and to date the lawyers have shown ZERO! |
