Its a myth perpetrated by main stream media-- saying no evidence of fraud.   Often times they'll insert words like-  no substantial evidence,  or no wide spread evidence.   They're thinking it gets them off the hook.

When the wording  goes further to say things like -- not enough to produce a Trump win -- that seems pretty solid reporting.  There's plenty of doubts from folks on the right.  Yet there's determination to try to clean up the election process for the future.  Who wouldn't want clean elections (??)

Yet I'd also suggest there are some folks on the left who are also angry that so many dark, cheating efforts were employed, which taints their candidate's election legitimacy.   Some Dems foresaw this possibility.

Have you seen the gripes from Senators Eliz Warren, Amy Klobuchar & Ron Wyden about Dominion voting systems & machines?   Plenty of stories.  Here's one quote those Dems wrote in Dec 2019: "warned about reports of machines “  “switching votes,” “undisclosed vulnerabilities,” and “improbable” results that “threaten the integrity of our elections.”   Click Here  

Seems those Dems were then fighting the same kinds of battles that Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell are now doing.  ALMOST --Comrades in arms.

Kinda puts a different light on the issue.  Almost a year earlier Dems were fussing about similar voting system foibles.  Obviously its bipartisan evidence we're seeing, when both sides are complaining. 

I'd suggest transparency, sunlight and investigations are the better path than sweeping these abuses under the rug.  Lets clean things up and be proud of our democracy.

My two cents