Politics Forum
|
List All Forums | About |
![]() ![]() Section 4: President & Congress Subject: Giuliani & Powell show Msg# 1104559
|
||||||
Pennsylvania officials can certify election results that currently show Democrat Joe Biden winning the state by more than 80,000 votes, a federal judge ruled Saturday, dealing President Donald Trump’s campaign another blow in its effort to invalidate the election. U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, turned down the request for an injunction by President Donald Trump’s campaign, spoiling the incumbent’s hopes of somehow overturning the results of the presidential contest. In his ruling, Brann said the Trump campaign presented “strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations ... unsupported by evidence.” “In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state,” the opinion said. “Our people, laws, and institutions demand more.” |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: YUP A very hot debate. Tucker was hard at it on Thursday, but then eased off a bit on Friday. He covered this Powell debate two nights. She has provided no proof. Not quite true Did you see reports where Powell is saying she sent Tucker papers including an affidavit and also one piece of info that hadn't been given to others??? Yet Tucker did not acknowledge getting anything. STRANGE??? WHY??? Kinda sounds like Tucker is following the FNC mantra, of insufficiency of evidence. And of course the attorneys are not going to reveal their best stuff ahead of time. That's due when actually in court. Anyhow, who appointed Tucker as keeper of the time table for insisting on answers now???? I don't think Tucker is going to be hosting Powell, as she's released statements about his "insulting, demanding and rude" attitude. Tom |