|
Politics Forum
|
List All Forums | About |
Reading all
70 messages in thread
message board home
message board home
Next
9/21/2020 5:18:23 PM
 
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 4: President & Congress Subject: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Msg# 1098384
|
||||||
| Because today conservatives control the presidency and the Senate. If O'Bama/Biden would have been in control of the Senate in 2016 they would have rammed Garland through. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Yet its bound to be coming out. Twenty-nine examples-- from early times of Washington & Adams, the 1860's with Lincoln & Grant, the mid-1900's with FDR & Eisenhower, down to the current day Trump example, of pre-election naming a nominee. Famous Presidents, as well as others. So, why wouldn't McConnell at least give Merrick Garland a hearing in 2016, 9 months before the election. But he will try to push Trump's nominee through with less than 2 months before the election? |
