Politics Forum
|
List All Forums | About |
![]() ![]() Section 25: Miscellaneous Subject: A Well-Armed Citizenry Msg# 1153612
|
||||||
There's been a bunch of reviews of Biden's State of the Union which include the word "horrible" in their titles. These stories have statements like-- Quote- "Biden didn’t knock it out of the park like he needed to last night. Reviews from the left and the right indicate it was a forgettable speech and not what he dearly needed to rejuvenate his Administration after its horrible first year." Click Here
Also some calling the speech “uninspired”. Even a CNN story was critical --quote-- "According to CNN’s numbers, only 41 percent of respondents had a “very positive” reaction to Biden’s speech, the lowest since 2007 when President George W. Bush was in the White House, a bad sign for Biden and the Democrats" Click Here This was an especially disappointing drop in results from TV watchers of the SOTU speech who "tend to be 'more supportive' of that president and his party" |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: I was interested especially in the Lauren Boebert (spelling?) business. I liked that she chanted "build the wall" and I like that she chanted that 13 soliders died due to Biden. But the dead soldiers is far from the only problem with that joke of maneuver in Afghanistan. We should remember also the Americans and Afghanis who could not escape from the country and were quickly and immediately persecuted by the Taliban. And we should remember that we gifted the Taliban with a military base and sophisticated weapns. Its good to see people like Boebart who are counteracting the zombie like approval of the DEMS ( e.g. Schumer jumping up like a jack-in-the-box ) to everything Mister Biden says and does. I was disappointed to see that Nancy did not rip up the speech. Oh well, maybe next time she will... |